May 7, 2009

Dear Oprah, I Love You, But You’re Promoting KFC? Seriously?

Ralph Loglisci

Ralph Loglisci

Food and Health Policy Writer

picture-6I have to admit it took me by surprise to read that Oprah Winfrey teamed up with KFC Tuesday to help promote the fast food giant’s new Kentucky Grilled Chicken. The Oprah Winfrey Show is giving away meal coupons good for two pieces of grilled chicken, two individual sides and a biscuit. It’s all part of the show’s new “Harpo Hookups” promotion. It really was a great hookup; everyone in the U.S. who had access to a computer could print up enough coupons to feed a family of four for free. (If you didn’t download it last night, you’re too late) Before I go on, I want to make it clear that there are few people whom I respect more than Oprah Winfrey. She’s done more to help the world than I could in a dozen lifetimes.  So, I believe that the reason for this giveaway, at least in Oprah’s view, is purely altruistic. I have no idea how many people will eat their first nutritious meal in quite a long time thanks to this generous promotion. At the very least it will help families save a few bucks in this difficult economy. However, knowing what I know about how most KFC chickens are raised, I wish Oprah could have found a more environmentally friendly way to “hookup” so many people with free food.

Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy grilled chicken; my beef with the whole thing is the way in which KFC’s chickens are grown. Back in 2004 the New York Times reported that KFC cooks up about 700 million chickens annually (my guess is the number is much higher now). The majority are grown in industrial style “broiler” houses that can hold tens of thousands of birds at a time. While working for the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production (PCIFAP) I was given a tour of a typical broiler house in Arkansas. The metal building was the length of at least two football fields, dark, filled with dust and reeked of ammonia. The smell was so strong that we had to escort one of the Commissioners out of the building before he passed out.  The floor was covered with wood shavings and other material that absorbed the birds’ manure and urine. The urine soaked “litter” often times burns the animals so badly that their feet develop sores. While at a processing plant I watched workers throw away the severed feet, which were headed for China, because the sore covered appendages were too unsightly to sell. I was told the low light helped to keep the birds calm. I also learned that the dim lights are never turned off. I suppose to stimulate 24-hour a day growth. Industrial chickens are designed to grow so fast that often times their legs can’t hold up their bodies and buckle under their own weight. Take a look at this trailer for a new movie entitled “Food Inc.” which depicts many of problems surrounding industrial poultry production, go in 34 seconds and look at a disturbing animation that shows how different industrial chickens are now compared to the chickens our grandparents ate almost 60 years ago. In short, industrially raised chickens live a brief and in my opinion miserable life, so companies like KFC can provide meat at deceiving low prices. (To be fair KFC does have an animal welfare program, however, many animal welfare experts believe it’s seriously lacking)

The environmental degradation due to the industrial system in which these birds are raised is equally disturbing. Much of the dead zones in U.S. waterways including the Chesapeake Bay are attributed to poultry and other agriculture related nutrient/waste runoff. I could go on about the use of antimicrobials and arsenicals used for growth promotion in industrial raised poultry and how both pose serious public health threats. I should also mention the huge amount of water and pesticides needed to grow the grain that the industrially raised birds are fed with.  To learn more about why the price of industrial meat is deceiving low I suggest you read PCIFAP’s final report.

This is just a suggestion, but maybe the next “Harpo Hookup” can involve community supported agriculture, a network of sustainable restaurants, or even a fast food restaurant chain that is committed to sourcing sustainable and humanely raised food for its customers like a Chipotle.


  1. Posted by Rebecca Kanter

    I don’t really follow or watch Oprah that much, but are there ANY examples where Oprah’s “helping the world” / altruism has NOT been via mainstream (just as I would say her show and her many spinoffs (e.g. bookclub, mag) have become mainstream) methods? Just a small thing that comes to mind, even when she opened her school in Africa (seriously, great) and bought the girls coats–the coats were of a really really expensive brand. Conversely, almost just as mainstream now, to compare, is Michelle Obama who dresses herself and her kids in relatively inexpensive clothes (that some middle-class and not just *rich* could afford) and plants an organic garden (despite all the cries from big ag/pesticide companies). In any case, if there is NO precedent that Oprah has deviated from the mainstream (as well as upper-class tendencies) then I really wouldn’t expect otherwise from her. And sadly, this KFC thing seems perfectly in line with something she would do (for at the core of it, she is *trying* to do good in her mind, without realizing the larger [societal] implications, of course).

  2. Posted by Jesse

    I don’t know if I agree with the classification of a KFC meal as “nutritious.” Sure, the chicken is grilled, but the biscuits, mac & cheese, mashed potatoes, potato wedges, and other menu items are loaded with fat and sodium.

  3. Posted by Erin

    Yes, I agree with Jesse, but let’s not forget that the Chicken (grilled or otherwise) is still incredibly unhealthy due to the antibiotics, steroids, and high fat content typical in factory farmed poultry. KFC is known to have an incredibly high content of these and because they are also subject to a great amount of stress during their short lives, the food product may also contain some very harmful hormones produced by the bird itself. Inhumane, carcinogenic, obesity-inducing…so many people would rather lie to themselves about this than discontinue supporting such an industry. Shame on Oprah, she should know better….

    BTW, I love the KFC taste, but I don’t eat it. I’m experimenting with recipes at home to recreate the flavor…

  4. Pingback: O no she didnt… « Wise Eats – Find Peace in What You Eat

  5. Posted by Robbi Drake

    Interesting commentary. Obviously the writer is attempting a very well known form of emotional abuse and manipulation.. the I love you but cycle is well known to be used by those who want to instill guilt.

    man was made to be an omnivore, hence the canines, made for tearing meat. Do what you like, but don’t please try to choke it down the throats of others. If you feel it to be more healthful, wonderful. You simple cannot force that onto others. There is such a thing as an ethical meat eater.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *